Following December 31, 2022, expensing of these property placed in service is as follows:  80 percent in 2023, 60 percent in 2024, 40 percent in 2025 and 20 percent in 2026.

Historically Buyers have lent to the objections of the Seller into some "step-up" in FMV in order to not jeopardize the trade and the Buyer would consent to allocate the cost dependent on the tax "foundation" of their fixed assets.  But with the law that the fiscal advantage for the Buyer might be too tempting to discount and the Buyer will attempt to devote as much value as you can to private real estate assets by looking for a high-value in value.
The Seller will likely be resistant to some step-ups into FMV for individual property assets as a result of probable increase in earnings caused by the sale and the Buyer is in favor of increased valuations leading to a larger tax advantage.  Due to these competing interests it's essential that a Cost Segregation Research plus a Valuation of Fixed Assets occur within the 90 day, or alternative allotted, window of time to make sure an agreed upon allocation of resources at the last purchase agreement.

Our cost segregation staff in Growth Management Group (GMG) is available to assist you navigate the law and its effects on commercial transactions.   GMG can offer a complimentary high-level evaluation of the effect a Cost Segregation research will have in your tax position so as to help you in your choice.

 Hence, the purchaser has a compelling interest in getting the Fair Market Value (FMV) of these land "stepped-up," - the greater the value of this property, the larger the tax advantage to the Buyer.

In capital-intensive transfers of commercial land ownership that the new Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) has increased the demand for a Cost Segregation Study for a tool to help in discovering property valuations throughout the Purchase Price Allocation clause time framework in the discussion of commercial real estate transactions.  This demand is directly linked to this newest TCJA first year 100% bonus depreciation allowance on qualified land.  Bonus depreciation can be applied to some new strength using a 20 year lifetime or even less. 

A remedy to this particular competing interest could be to the Buyer to "gross up" the cost to offset the incremental tax obligation to the Seller.  This provides the possibility of a "win-win" because the purchaser understands a greater tax advantage on the immediate expensing of private property along with the Seller gets insured on the excess tax obligation together with the higher selling price.  The seller, to protect their position, also needs to run a Cost Segregation Research and Valuation of Fixed Assets to ensure a reasonable Purchase Price Allocation Agreement.

The final result is each dollar recorded in a Cost Segregation study for 7, 5 and 15 year resources because of their company is currently eligible for 100 percent year bonus depreciation.  This can indicate a very considerable increased taxation advantage to the Buyer and is surely a motivation for this Buyer to wish to have spent more of their cost of a company to private real estate assets using stepped-up FMV.
Another reason to possess the Cost Segregation Research performed inside the Purchase Price Allocation time period results in a 2012 U.S. Tax Court Ruling in Peco Foods, Inc., T.C. Memo.  2012-18 which disallowed a switch to the cost allocation arrangement employing a post-acquisition Cost Segregation Study.  As revealed from the Peco instance, when the agreement has closed, there's not any going back to produce the chance to reclassify home to acquire a more favorable tax treatment.
Sellers and Buyers not merely have competing interests on cost, in addition they have competing interests on taxation implications.